Association between echocardiographic features and inflammatory biomarkers with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Respiratory infections are one of the most common comorbidities identified in hospitalized patients. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic greatly impacted healthcare systems, including acute cardiac services. Aim: This study aimed to describe the echocardiographic findings of patients with COVID-19 infections and their correlations with inflammatory biomarkers, disease severity, and clinical outcomes. Methods: This observational study was conducted between June 2021 and July 2022. The analysis included all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who had transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) scans within 72 h of admission. Results: The enrolled patients had a mean age of 55.6 ± 14.7 years, and 66.1% were male. Of the 490 enrolled patients, 203 (41.4%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Pre-ICU TTE findings showed significantly higher incidence right ventricular dysfunction (28 [13.8%] vs. 23 [8.0%]; P = 0.04) and left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion abnormalities (55 [27.1%] vs. 29 [10.1%]; p < 0.001) in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients. In-hospital mortality was 11 (2.2%), all deaths of ICU patients. The most sensitive predictors of ICU admission (p < 0.05): cardiac troponin I level (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.733), followed by hs-CRP (AUC = 0.620), creatine kinase-MB (AUC = 0.617), D-dimer (AUC = 0.599), and lactate dehydrogenase (AUC = 0.567). Binary logistic regression showed that reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF), elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and dilated right ventricle were echocardiographic predictors of poor outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Echocardiography is a valuable tool in assessing admitted patients with COVID-19. Lower LVEF, pulmonary hypertension, higher D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and B-type natriuretic peptide levels were predictors of poor outcomes.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study at a quaternary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Healthcare Workers (HCWs). METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study among 3644 HCWs at King Saud Medical City (KSMC) during the last two weeks of December 2020. A Google form survey was used to collect data on demographics, underlying health conditions, job duties, infection control competencies, COVID-19 exposure history, symptoms, and confirmed infections. FINDINGS: 26.5% demonstrated seropositivity to SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 10-fold higher than the national seroprevalence (2.36) conducted in May 2020. Seropositivity was significantly higher among non-Saudi HCWs and participants who lived outside the hospital dormitory p < 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Seropositivity was significantly higher among HCWs who worked on clinical areas of high exposure level, and those who spent longer duration working with patients with COVID-19; p = 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs can go unrecognized, which magnifies the importance of complying with universal masking and social distancing directives. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in HCWs can help healthcare leaders in considering staff allocations and assignments accordingly.

Characteristics of healthcare workers with COVID-19: A retrospective descriptive study in a quaternary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological and clinical presentation of Healthcare Workers (HCWs) affected by COVID-19. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted at King Saud Medical City (KSMC), Saudi Arabia (KSA). All KSMC employees who acquired COVID-19 between March 22nd to July 15th, 2020 have been included. Their data has been anonymously analyzed. FINDINGS: During the study period, among the 12000 HCWs working at KSMC, 9.75% tested positive for COVID-19. The source of HCWs infections was mainly community acquired (85%) which included incidences of transmission in hospital dormitories. Transmission among coworkers was the main source of hospital acquired incidences. Direct patient care was reported in 99.8% of study subjects among the high-risk areas, compared to 3.4% in low-risk areas (p-value <0.001), 12-h shifts were more common in the medium and high-risk areas, and at least one symptom was reported by 93.1% of HCWs in high-risk areas compared to 81.6% in low-risk areas (p-value <0.001). CONCLUSION: In KSA, for HCWs, reducing lapses in compliance with masking in non-patient care areas should be considered. In KSA the role that hospital dormitories play in the community transmission of COVID-19 among HCWs need further studies.